Flickr: The young smokers Pool

Link: => bastconpamog.nnmcloud.ru/d?s=YToyOntzOjc6InJlZmVyZXIiO3M6MzY6Imh0dHA6Ly9iYW5kY2FtcC5jb21fZG93bmxvYWRfcG9zdGVyLyI7czozOiJrZXkiO3M6MjY6IllvdW5nIGdpcmxzIHNtb2tpbmcgdmlkZW9zIjt9


They have a lot of passion and emotion, such a strong will. They aren't going to leave a paper trail -or an e-mail trail- that will lead the police right to their front door! A reasonable question deserves a reasonable answer.

Then last month, after Mark's death, her cousin posted the picture to Facebook and tagged Ellison. Yes, its true that a tiny proportion of the population cannot distinguish that dividing line, but to legislate for them means infringing on some very basic rights for everyone else.

fasttagdeepinhalepage1

The guys who are screaming about castration are beginning to scare me. Little girls smoking cigarettes is one thing, adults spilling blood is quite another. I hate they way some activists use kids as human shields. Whatever freedom they wish to stifle, they claim, We're protecting the kids, and they think they young girls smoking videos be questioned. I shudder to think how unsuspecting kids are arm-twisted into making false accusations, so some ambitious prosecutor can score a cheap headline. He touched you there, didn't he. Give the right answer and show us how smart you are. If you don't work through your denial, we can't help you. They'll put you away, and you'll never see your brothers and sisters again. Now show us where he touched you. Don't forget what brings us all together here: we like to watch women smoking. Shall I blame a guy who likes to watch girls. The pot calls the kettle black. If I have to choose between a nut with some pics from Midnight Auto Parts, and a nut with a sharp scalpel, I know which way I'm going. I'm almost ashamed that I didn't post before this in reply to some of the posts that were making me a little ill. On Sun, 10 May 1998, Edward J. It's a little scary young girls smoking videos quickly something like this escalates. Just as a mob gives some people courage to say and do things they wouldn't normally consider, the faceless nature of the net allows people with a hair-trigger temper to post these kinds of violent rants. Some of the coverage of appeals of old molestation cases which were prosecuted in the wave of day-care hysteria in the eighties in the past year should give every parent I'm not one pause about the way authority can make devastating changes in their lives with a single stroke. Whether this is because he's the type who simply can't admit being wrong, or because he's trying to avoid a devastating lawsuit, or because he's warped doesn't really matter very much to the parents, who've been deprived of their kids and their liberty for more than a decade. I'm not claiming that paedophilia doesn't exist, or that it shouldn't be dealt with harshly. If anything, once you're convicted of an offense, you should probably either go away forever, or be closely monitored all your life the latter for certain if the assault was violent. But the tools that unscrupulous overzealous prosecutors and therapists have to produce convictions is truly frightening. And let's not forget that this guy asked for something which although distasteful to many of us, is not even illegal. Fine, draw that line, it can be done without frothing at the figurative mouth. But given that if pictures do get sent, Matt will post them, young girls smoking videos not the arbiters. And you can expess your dislike without advocating violence, as Brujo and Cros did. You're comparing a criminal activity for which someone should rightly be locked up with one that is not even mildly criminal, i. Yes, and I'd prefer that Brujo's fantasies not include stuffing somebody's genitals into their mouth who hasn't hurt anyone at all. Failing that, I'd prefer he kept them to himself. Seriously, I'd return to Mr Wood's point about the pot calling the kettle black in commenting on your 'crossed wires' analogy, Brook. But I confess I have doubts about how much good someone with your level of anger can do. So whats he, or anyone else, going to do with the pictures. What is it that goes on in the minds of people who get off on looking at pics of kids smoking. I have asked this before and noted there was no response. Please let us know, maybe there is something being misunderstood here. Maybe not the same league, but possibly the same sport. If we're getting down to saying that one perversion is much the same as another, I think we're loosing sight of discretion. There's alot to say here about anger, abuse and young girls smoking videos. So let's not get angry about all this, let's hear, what is it all you folks out there get off on when looking at kids smoking. We've heard lots about what's delicious about seeing women smoke, but there's a noticable absense of stuff about kids given the degree of support kids pics have gotten over the past 6 months or so. A reasonable question deserves a reasonable answer. Let's begin by defining our terms: what is a kid. For the sake of argument, let's say that a kid is a pre-adolescent girl, under the age of 12. At that age, girls are still flat-chested, think that boys are yucky, and have no idea of acting sexy. Pre-adolescent girls who smoke do exist, but sexy pre-adolescent girls do not exist. Another fantasy is the so-called connection between fantasy and behavior. Child molesters don't stay home and surf the net - they go out and molest young girls smoking videos. They don't read about it - they do it. I've seen the news reports about the homes of child molesters filled with stacks of kiddie porn; and I've seen the scare stories of computer networks for pedophiles. Child molesters may be crazy, but they aren't stupid. They aren't going to leave a paper trail -or an e-mail trail- that will lead the police right to their front door. There are some real psychopaths out there: who kidnap little girls, beat them, rape them, and kill them; and these perverts must all be hunted down and put away. But if a guy wants to stay home and watch Lolita or Paper Moon, I say leave him alone. Bernd, very very good post my friend. It would be so much easier to stay quiet, since the case you state is obviously contrary to the general mood of the group. But that would be taking the easy way outand I admire courage of standing against the tide and attempting to be rational in facing a display of raw emotion. I have been trying to respond to this thread for a couple of days, but its been difficult to find the words to convey what I want to say. Your post Bernd, covered most of it better than I could. Like anyone, I abhorr the idea of exploitation of kids I have 3 myselfso I understand and sympathise with a lot of what Brujo, Cros et all are saying. In other words there is fantasy and reality. Yes, its true that a tiny proportion of the population cannot distinguish that dividing line, but to legislate for them means infringing on some very basic rights for everyone else. Young girls smoking videos of course love all this, and use such fears as a tool to impose all sorts of restrictions and censorships. But on this issue we're definitely on the same wavelength. The only rational basis I can think of for objecting to them is young girls smoking videos Jim. Absent that, it's just a photo or home movie. I can't tell you that, and I'm not sure it would help you out if I could and not the least reason for this is that I think you're being a little disingenuous in asking - looking for me to set you up some fish that you believe it would be easy and fun to shoot at, inside a barrel. Here's something I can tell you, though: lots of people have lots of fantasies they consider arousing, that would be impractical or impossible to carry out in real life, but if they were, they'd be viewed as criminal. I'd like to give you a ferinstance, but any examples from my own catalogue would cause those that didn't laugh loud and long to either shake their heads in confusion, or puke. Plus, I get embarrassed easily. So instead, I'll rely on an old standby. What they want if I understand the Psychs that have written about this is to give up control completely, and so they invent a fantasy about a criminal activity to allow that situation to happen, in fantasy. One guy likes cork tips, another all whites. Can anyone explain those preferences, or their relationship to human sexuality. It probably all gets formed at a fairly early age. Not too long ago reefer madness ruled no, not cannabis-induced psychosis, but the idiocy in the minds of authorities that marihuana use led to all manner of depravity. I used to read all about how high percentages of heroin users had started with mary jane. I think you'll agree that that percentage is pretty low. I can't say it better than Ed Wood did, so I'll reprint his words: On Tue, 12 May 1998 01:04:59 -0700, Edward J. Alan, you are a person whom I admire and respect for speaking your mind on any issue, not matter how controversial. And the posts from Ed Wood Bernd. I will agree that Dragging Out the Kids is one of the most pernicious propaganda techniques in existence, because it plays on such universal and deeply-felt emotions. And I'll agree that the powers-that-be exploit those emotions, and that the technique is especially heinous because it turns our best instincts against us. But Charlie asked a very good question also: What is it that goes on in the minds of people who get off on looking at pics of kids smoking. I have asked this before and noted there was no response. Please let us know, young girls smoking videos there is something being misunderstood here. I also have yet to see a concise response to that question, and I think the reason is that the response would be too much for most of us to tolerate. I like violent movies too, Alan. Furthermore, I just posted a pretty sadistic drawing to this group, although I would never condone such behavior in real life unless it was just an erotic little game between two consenting adults. However, can you imagine a film or even a piece of artwork in which a child is graphically molested, and which portrays the molestor in a sympathetic manner, ever drawing anything but wide-spread condemnation. I cannot agree with any attempt to intellectualize this explosive emotional issue. I just showed this thread to my girlfriend, and her only comment was, The idea that anyone could be sexually attracted to a child makes me want to puke. That's a pretty succinct statement, and it expresses my feelings as well. Many of the responses to this thread have more to do with feelings than with thoughts. In this case, I believe that's completely appropriate. Other people's minds are their own business. And the only action in question here is looking at pictures. Often the more extreme the fantasy the better. I remember Alan 'threatening' me with getting a dozen men to use me whilst I was tied to the bed. I'm not sure he expected me to react the way I did. I still wouldn't want to be raped though, but thinking or talking about it can add to the more run of the mill things that most of us do in bed.

For the sake of argument, let's say that a kid is a pre-adolescent girl, under the age of 12. Alan, you are a person whom I admire and respect for speaking your mind on any issue, not matter how controversial. I was emotional, wild, rebellious at school. But she says her life has improved, and she wishes she could talk again with that photographer lady. I took her to the doctor's the next day to get her on the Pill. Sam agrees that she will do more around the family home, in Gosport, Hampshire, when bribed.